Skip to main content

Elections and the people (cess)pool

Socialism/Communism made the mistake of evaluating people as potical animals, mostly they do not rank above social animal category. Even Gandhi when arranging the first democratic elections in India in a principality state, only allowed the educated to paricipate. With basic literacy rate approaching an average 30%, no wonder Indian elections have been following the principle of GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) in computing science.

People should have voting rights only if they can demonstrate that they have the capability to contribute to the political cause. So, maybe some basic literacy or higer education should be a bonus for their electoral contribution. A class 4 pass person should get one vote, exponentially increasing with theit kind and level of education(and or profession/job/role, so 8 pass should get 3 votes, finally a PhD should get 100 votes. The same scale can add the illiterate also at the bottom of the scale.

Each one having one vote is basically allowing elections to go to the dogs and wolves to get elected. People have not achived much in general over the human history, except follow the basic Darwinian principles and manage to survive and increase in poulation. Some few have contibuted beyond basic animal like subsistence and lead the overall race to higher thought and purpose. We are standing on the shoulders of these giants. The majority have not contributed to these achivements but only idly pluck the fruits of their labor.

This somnolent majority will happily overestimate their importance and intelligence but overall contribute to regression, as is their nature. A simple logical projection of human progress marks the years preceding the present days as the peak of human achievement i.e when we peaked in intelligence and capabilties before automation reduced demands on our grey matter. Even a london cabbie had to pass exams of the entire road network before getting licensed. Now even libraries are redundant with Google scholar digitizing all printed matter.

The future is going to increase reliabilty of human mental muscle on automatons, and just like sedentary lifestyles and excess diets promoted an obesity epidemic, we are likely to have an idiocy epidemic feeding off junk information fed by social media. Symptoms are already showing in Modi and Trump like leaders who exploit this opportunity.


At the extreme, with Smartness no longer a valuable criteria for survival, Looks will dominate and stupidity will propagate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Of what purpose, happiness?

Happiness is an end unto itself. After it is what it is. Purpose of life is after all 64 (and happiness). A self fulfilling goal. No need to inquire about the purpose of our actions, what is right or wrong with a deeper understanding. Be happy, purposefully. Easy? Right? Perhaps a bit too easy or Simple but not easy?

Management greatness

We have so much to thank modern management for. Penicillin, the A bomb, computers, internet, automobiles and air travel, high yield crops and electricity. Everything about human progress depends upon management contributions. That is the reason it is the greatest thing ever and most talked about and well paid profession, since it is so essential for progress. How could we ever do without it?

Ban intraday/ non delivery trades

What purpose, other than betting, is the reason for such trades? Stick to the basics of what a Share constitutes. A share of company ownership/capital. A minimum lock in of 5 days should be enforced for all buyers. The method of enforcement can be a progressive taxation regime. 99% tax for intraday. So the taxation should be enforced based on the Exact duration of the ownership, computers can compute that very easily. Since shares reside only in dematerialized form and the depositories of shares are only two in India which are both government owned, data of such trades is easily computable and enforceable. The government makes money from betting may be a good excuse, just like lotteries, to continue with the charade. Market is always right, regulations should be lax and not too heavy, just right enough to protect the societal norms. In which case they should never be used as tools for progressive thought. Stock market is not for betting. It should be differentiated from do...