Skip to main content

Elections and the people (cess)pool

Socialism/Communism made the mistake of evaluating people as potical animals, mostly they do not rank above social animal category. Even Gandhi when arranging the first democratic elections in India in a principality state, only allowed the educated to paricipate. With basic literacy rate approaching an average 30%, no wonder Indian elections have been following the principle of GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) in computing science.

People should have voting rights only if they can demonstrate that they have the capability to contribute to the political cause. So, maybe some basic literacy or higer education should be a bonus for their electoral contribution. A class 4 pass person should get one vote, exponentially increasing with theit kind and level of education(and or profession/job/role, so 8 pass should get 3 votes, finally a PhD should get 100 votes. The same scale can add the illiterate also at the bottom of the scale.

Each one having one vote is basically allowing elections to go to the dogs and wolves to get elected. People have not achived much in general over the human history, except follow the basic Darwinian principles and manage to survive and increase in poulation. Some few have contibuted beyond basic animal like subsistence and lead the overall race to higher thought and purpose. We are standing on the shoulders of these giants. The majority have not contributed to these achivements but only idly pluck the fruits of their labor.

This somnolent majority will happily overestimate their importance and intelligence but overall contribute to regression, as is their nature. A simple logical projection of human progress marks the years preceding the present days as the peak of human achievement i.e when we peaked in intelligence and capabilties before automation reduced demands on our grey matter. Even a london cabbie had to pass exams of the entire road network before getting licensed. Now even libraries are redundant with Google scholar digitizing all printed matter.

The future is going to increase reliabilty of human mental muscle on automatons, and just like sedentary lifestyles and excess diets promoted an obesity epidemic, we are likely to have an idiocy epidemic feeding off junk information fed by social media. Symptoms are already showing in Modi and Trump like leaders who exploit this opportunity.


At the extreme, with Smartness no longer a valuable criteria for survival, Looks will dominate and stupidity will propagate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Absurdity of Communism and the Validity of its Successes

For Better or for Worse, we are limited in our approach by our ideas, as a society. Communism is an absurd idea. It is only revolutionary in the sense that it includes the economy as being under absolute state control. The state is of course the state with powers above all. Absolute power corrupts absolutely and hence coopting the state to provide more and not less is designed to be sub optimal, maybe even grandly and now generally branded a failure. The sub optimal results suffice though if they can, or at least promise, to feed the starving masses. Nobody usually likes a revolution, except when the alternative is to eat the (in)famous french recipe cake. But communism was an idealistic, bold experimentation to the bourgeoise general apathy. It went beyond just economic equality by adding to the new French recipe of libertie, egalite, fraternite. Womens's equality and voting rights. Yes, what was so progressive seems regressive, just because the ideas of co...

Of what purpose, happiness?

Happiness is an end unto itself. After it is what it is. Purpose of life is after all 64 (and happiness). A self fulfilling goal. No need to inquire about the purpose of our actions, what is right or wrong with a deeper understanding. Be happy, purposefully. Easy? Right? Perhaps a bit too easy or Simple but not easy?

priority priority and priority

They say for property only one thing matters, location, location and location. As also, for any plan of action what matters is the priority of tasks. Relating this to governance (and not my own messed up life!) I would say that it should focus on a few essentials before trying to fix everything else. The american minimalist approach to government would have us fix only defence and law and order as tasks. Government does not have much to role in defence, except setting the overall strategic agenda and paying the army which pretty much does the rest. Congress has ensured its Chaupat raj by murdering the law and order situation by a sub 1% budget allocation. My take on priority would be to add to the top, Welfare, and not much else to the list. A government that cannot look after the well being of its people has in fact no right to defend itself, nor to enforce its non-welfare objectives. Welfare is all encompassing; and closely related to law and order. Government should make la...